“NATO delegates navigate security challenges amid a context of rising tensions”
written by Grace Lituba, Journalist, LIMUN 2025
As discussions unfold within the NATO committee, security concerns surrounding Russia’s potential expansion in the northern Baltic region and Arctic territories have taken center stage. The delegation of Germany, represented by James Beaver, has been vocal in advocating for increased military preparedness while maintaining NATO’s defensive stance.
“We are not an aggressive alliance”, the delegate emphasized. However, the committee remains divided between those who caution against provoking Russia and those who argue that bolstering defense is essential to protect NATO members - an opinion shared by Germany.
Balancing defense and diplomacy
Discussions have also revolved around enhancing military collaboration, intelligence sharing, and standardizing military equipment to improve NATO’s operational effectiveness. The strategic importance of the Arctic Circle has surfaced as a key point of debate, as rising geopolitical competition over natural resources fuels concerns about national interests shaping military ambitions.
The German Elections: A potential game-changer?
With Germany’s federal elections scheduled for February 23, its NATO stance could shift dramatically depending on the outcome. A change in government could alter Germany’s position on defense and security, potentially reshaping ongoing negotiations. The United States’ evolving foreign policy has also added an extra layer of complexity. With a new administration implementing significant policy changes, NATO allies are closely monitoring Washington’s stance. The delegates acknowledged the challenge of keeping up: “News changes daily. Yesterday, we were discussing events that happened just the day before. Staying informed is crucial because it directly shapes our negotiations.”.
A training ground for future diplomats
Beyond the negotiations, many delegates see the simulation as a valuable stepping stone for careers in foreign policy and defense strategy.
“A lot of people here want to work for a foreign affair office or NATO. This is a great opportunity to train,” James remarked. “We’re striving for realism, and I think we’re doing quite well.”
The delegates emphasized the importance of understanding diverse national perspectives. James’ War Studies have helped him grasp Germany’s strategic position, but he noted that cross-referencing international media sources - including Scandinavian and Swedish outlets - was crucial for fully comprehending geopolitical dynamics.
The bigger picture: NATO’s role in a changing landscape
Deputy Director Jerome Becheraway reminded delegates that while Russia’s presence in the Arctic is a pressing concern, NATO must maintain a broad strategic focus. “Preventing Russian expansion should not be our sole objective. We need to look at the bigger picture and ensure all member states agree on the final resolution,” he advised. The ongoing debates over defending Sweden and Finland underscore NATO’s core principle: security, not aggression. As one delegate put it, “NATO’s responsibility is not to attack, but to defend.”
With every NATO member holding veto power, achieving consensus remains a challenge. Romania’s representative, Max, described the negotiations as both productive and challenging, given the need to balance national priorities and collective defense strategies. “The vibe is friendly and cooperative”, he noted, reflecting on the balance of diplomacy and military strategy that defines NATO’s decision-making process.
As the conference progresses, all eyes are on how NATO will navigate these complex security dilemmas while preserving its commitment to collective defense. Will the alliance reinforce its military posture, or will diplomatic caution prevail? The next negotiations will be crucial in determining NATO’s path forward.
